Requests

requests1

Thankfully we get lots of requests for new pages.  Well…the wife recently informed me that my way of collecting my requests was pretty weak.  She seems to think that writing down requests on whatever piece of paper or napkin or bill that is currently on my desk is not the way to do it.  So….since she is way smarter than me….I have decided to create a page just for requests.  Plus it should give a good idea of what pages are coming down the pike.

My logic in picking which page to do next….I lean heavily towards the subject that has the most requests.

  • Roger Corman – request by Dan
  • Peter Cushing – request made by SteveLensman, Dan & Brando 90
  • Disney Live Action 1967-1980 – request by Mimic
  • Foreign Movies requested by Laurent
  • Samuel Goldwyn – request by Dan
  • Sam Katzman – request by Dan
  • Fritz Lang – request by Lupino, Just Me
  • Bruce Lee – request by Brando 90
  • Harold Lloyd – request by Søren, Me
  • Henry Mancini – request by Flora
  • Patricia Medina – request by Dan
  • Mirisch Brothers – request by Dan
  • Edward Small – request by Dan
  • Rudolph Valentino – request by Laurent

Completed requests:

Many more to come…have to find all of my old napkins and transfer the requests to this page.

 

(Visited 7 times)

1,625 thoughts on “Requests

    1. Hey Brando90….glad you liked your Ryan page….I will add Laurel & Hardy to the page….but I have done so research on them….and there is very little box office information on their full length movies…but maybe I will find some in the future. Thanks for the suggestions.

  1. Per my comment on Henry Fonda’s page when you recently shared it and I talked about it:

    I think you should continue with the family dynasty pages like with the Barrymores and the Hustons.

    You have done a page on Henry Fonda, and on Jane Fonda.

    I’m requesting a page on Peter Fonda.

  2. Hi Bruce
    What about these names…
    Virginia Mayo
    Dorothy Lamour
    Paulette Goddard
    Ralph Bellamy
    Don Ameche

    1. Hey Søren….all good suggestions….and all added to the request list…thanks for the suggestions.

  3. By definition the AFI list of screen legends excludes stars who were not considered historically ‘great’.. The beauty of Cogerson is that it gives information about not just the ‘greats’ but also stars of a perceived much lesser status. However Joan Crawford once remarked that to be considered an important movie star one had to carry some weight at the box office; and a film historian has said that we know that for example Alan Ladd was an important star in his day because there was little else but Alan Ladd in the droves of financially successful film he mad in the forties and fifties.

    Within such contexts some of the preferences of both AFI and Cogerson do leave me puzzled. Sophia Loren’s box office record is nowhere vertiginous (nor for that matter is Greta Garbo’s!). And take Ava Gardner. In none of the 15 top grossing films in Cogerson was Ava the top-billed star; her name was always no higher than second to the likes of Gable,Burton,Ty Power, Peck, Heston, Bogie, Robert Taylor, or Lancaster. Indeed I can think of only ONE film that Ava ‘carried’ as the top-billed star and which reputedly made money: The Little |Hut [1957]. Thus Margaret Hinxman, a respected film critic of Photoplay magazine in the fifties demanded: “Where’s the evidence that Gardner is big box office?”

    Conversely though between 1938 and 1948 Deanna Durbin made a string of films most of which apparently were box office successes; where Deanna was to paraphrase that historian the only thing in them; and which were said to have saved her studio (Universal) from bankruptcy. Yet the late Miss Durbin has been ignored by AFI and (so far anyway) by Cogerson. When I consider all that I have no urge whatsoever to sing my favourite MacDonald/Eddy song “Ah! sweet mystery of life At last I’ve found you!”

    1. Hey Robert Roy. I like the AFI list but I do not agree with it 100%…..especially on the actress side. I did a page that took the AFI Top 50 and created my Top 50 current stars….when I did that….I feel I was able to make the AFI Top 25 Actress page better….as I moved Audrey Hepburn, Olivia de Havilland, Marilyn Monroe, Grace Kelly and Sophia Loren to the modern stars….and added Myrna Loy, Irene Dunne and Deborah Kerr to the classic stars….to me it made the list much much better. https://www.ultimatemovierankings.com/top-100-movie-stars/

      As for Ava G……not sure how she made the list….she herself was not impressed with her own career…she was great in small doses…..the sexy Thelma Ritter of movies…..when like you say it was her movie…those movies did not fare very well.

      As for Deanna Durbin….before we started doing these pages….we admit we were not aware of Deanna Durbin….she is now on our radar….She only has 23 acting credits…..with two of them being shorts….leaving 21 movies…we have 4 in our database already….leaving on 17 to research…..though her movies were with Universal…..not one of the easiest to find box office information on…..but only 17 movies interests me.

      Thanks for the great comment…it is appreciated.

      1. Thanks for your comments on the AFI list. You’re right about the women’s list being more out of line than the men’s. All of the ‘Big Beasts’ that you would expect to be in the men’s list are there and one could only really quarrel about the order in which they are placed [Henry Fonda bigger than Wayne? -come on!]

        To be fair to you you have now covered all of the big classic stars that I personally would be interested in with the exception of Durbin and Robert Taylor. Thanks also for your info about The Men. I always thought that Box Office Story’s gross of 7.1 was way over the top. I should add that I do not see any inconsistency between your grosses and calculations under the Consumer Price Index. Your figures illustrate what a film of yesteryear would make if it was released today and had the same attendance figures. Thus your figures are excellent for making comparisons with modern films’ popularity. Consumer Price calculations on the other hand are good for illustrating what value in today’s dollars one can place on actual grosses of long ago when cinema ticket prices were much cheaper in real terms than they are today.As one historian pointed out a forties Cagney film with the same audience as a Cruise/Hanks film today would have needed in fact to have doubled that audience to have a box office gross of equal dollar value to the Cruise/Hanks film in today’s money. But as I have said there is no conflict in all of that. If you want to see a real conflict of figures look up sometime the actual grosses quoted by Box Office Mojo and The Numbers for Marvin/Eastwood’s Paint Your Wagon.

        Finally I laughed at your description of Ava as a”sexy Thelma Ritter”. Coincidentally a line relating to each of these ladies has long been ingrained into my mind. In the Cold War Widmark movie Pick-up on South Street Thelma said something like “I have nothing against Communism. I just don’t like Communists as people.”! The poster tagline for the Bogie/Ava Gardner movie The Barefoot Contessa read “The World’s Most Beautiful Animal!” I’ll sign off by saying thanks again Bruce for all the hard work you have put into illuminating for all movie buffs the history of many aspects of the film marketplace.

        1. Hey Robert Roy
          1. I have really enjoyed your comments this week.
          2. You have made some great points.
          3. I will add Durbin and Taylor to my request page…and try to knock them out soon.
          4. The Men was one of the few misfires in the 1950s for Brando
          5. Glad you liked my Thelma Ritter comment.
          6. I tried to contact Box Office Mojo about their Paint Your Wagon issue….but they had no interest in my point.
          I greatly appreciate all the nice words about our website…and for visiting our website.

          1. Bruce you have brought definitive consistency to a lot of box office mysteries down through the years. It used to be that we would read in the press statements like “Jaws has grossed over 200 million”.or “The Godfather has passed the 50 million mark.” Such statements are meaningless of course unless they can be placed within a proper context. As you know a bald figure can relate to domestic rental, domestic gross, worldwide rental or worldwide gross. Your pages always make crystal clear the type of revenue to which you are referring.

            Perhaps someday there will be also be more information available about the actual profits made by films. As it is we don’t know which ones made the most money after costs, etc. The extent of the gross is just a rough guide but is not definitive. Some big-grossing films have allegedly lost money, whilst smaller grossing ones have been profitable because of modest production budgets. Matters are not helped by what actor James Coburn called the creative accounting of film producers designed to deny actors promised profit shares.. For example on top of a massive flat fee for Superman (1978) Brando was reportedly promised a percentage of over 11% of
            the film’s profits. In 1978/79 Superman grossed 300.3 million dollars worldwide (over 1 billion in today’s dollars!). Yet the producers apparently told Brando that there were no profits because of massive costs. It was subsequently reported that he took legal action and was given an out of court settlement (figures vary between 15 and 18 million dollars in 1980s money). Anyway keep doing what YOU are doing. I am very keen to see more of your updated classical actor pages; very much enjoyed today’s one on Henry!

          2. Thanks for the awesome words about our website. As for production costs and profits….the RKO and MGM ledgers have all that information. I wish all studios would have taken the time to do ledgers like they did.

            Creative accounting has been around a long time….and will be around for a long time…even in this era of “transparency”. Paramount claimed Coming To America was not profitable….until they got sued….and lost. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buchwald_v._Paramount case is very interesting to read.

            Thanks again for the kind words.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.